We apologize for the abrupt end to this episode - we expreienced technical difficulties toward the end. He who shall not be named gave a speech to the Congressional critters and basically said none of the Keynesian crap we've tried so far has worked so we need to raise more revenue (confiscate private wealth) and invest (print more worthless money and redistribute from the productive to the unproductive), in other words more of the same shit. The Republicans responded – twice! One response came from the RINO establishment delivered by Sen. RINO Rubio, but he can't hold any water against Sen. Republican Rand Paul (Republican properly understood to be Constitutionally Conservative.) Join Tex and Rex for irreverent, relevant and radioactive conservatism with bite Sunday night at 10:00 pm EST to discuss the rhetoric, the record and the reality of the Rubio response compared with Rand's.Although both have similar voting records in the Senate, one enthusiastically supported Rove's monster in 2012 and the other reluctantly endorsed the presumptuous nominee after Ron Paul gave him the go-ahead to avoid unnecessary pressure on the junior Senator. They both sound conservative, but are they? Do they understand the Constitution? Are they just spewing rhetoric as a set-up for 2016 or do they mean what they say? Why was Rubio selected to give the official GOP SOTU response by the same crew that crapped all over Rand's dad and his delegates? Do these two junior Senators represent the future of the GOP, if it even has one? Or, do they exemplify the current fight for dominance between authentic conservatives and the appeasers who desire merely to manage the decline?
Conservative![]()
| SOTU![]()
| Rand Paul![]()
| Marco Rubio![]()
| Republican Party![]()
Conservative









