The infantile name-calling never ceases from Democratic ?leadership?. So, Mr. Reid, Clarence Thomas is ?white?, because he's not a ?card-carrying? member of the ?plantation?? Frankly, I thought he was going to refer to the other male justices as black, but I guess, he didn't want to be considered racist. Same old tune; liberals can use the race-card at a whim, but just let a conservative criticize Obama … As I've done enough to make the case that Clarence Thomas is indeed, a remarkable brother; wise, balanced, and I forgot – black, there really isn't a need to defend him any further. However, what should be noted, is the glaring hypocrisy of those who call for [the one-way street of] ?tolerance?. This week, Barack Obama met with Governor Perry, to discuss the border crisis of illegal-immigrant children. All the more interesting, in light of the lecturing of liberals, on ?compassion for children?, as it's conveniently forgotten that most of their parents have abandoned them. In fact, an MS-NBC pundit actually brought – THE BIBLE into the debate, just when I thought, this was the ?hang-up? of the ?right-wing?. Speaker Boehner has released the details of his lawsuit against Obama. Despite the fact that SCOTUS ruled in favor of Hobby Lobby, democrats are trying to circumvent the Ruling, in the name of ?women's rights?. Wasn't the GOP lambasted for continuing its' challenges to Obamacare, after SCOTUS' ruling? Oh, I forgot; REPUBLICANS aren't allowed to mount such challenges!
↧